House bill would block sales of E15

Posted on Written by Reagan Haynes

U.S. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., introduced a bill this week that would block the use of gasoline blended with 15 percent ethanol until its harmful effects are further investigated.

H.R. 875 would repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s waiver approving the sale of E15 until the agency seeks an independent scientific analysis from the National Academy of Sciences to explore the harmful effects of the blend, according to Sensenbrenner’s office.

It’s one of a number of bills introduced in Congress seeking either the overturn of the waiver allowing E15 or asking for more studies on the effects of the fuel blend or to revisit the Renewable Fuel Standard, an EPA mandate requiring increasing use of biofuels such as ethanol that passed in 2005 and was strengthened in 2007.

Earlier this month, Sens. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and David Vitter, R-La., introduced a bill in the Senate that would overturn the EPA waivers that allowed gasoline with 15 percent ethanol to be introduced into the fuel supply and prohibit such future waivers.

Wicker’s office is already “getting a lot of pushback from the ethanol folks,” Jim Currie, legislative director of the National Marine Manufacturers Association, told Soundings Trade Only.

“We gave them a lot of material I’ve accumulated on the effects of E15, from groundwater depletion to conservation easements to food costs and engine damage,” Currie told Trade Only. “Its damages go way beyond what we as boat folks worry about. We were trying to help them on that, and I think we succeeded there.”

Currie and John McKnight, director of environmental safety and compliance for the NMMA, are also working with Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., as his office drafts a bill that would re-examine the Renewable Fuel Standard.

“They are in the process of drafting a bill on ethanol that will probably go further than some of the others and get in and look at the Renewable Fuel Standard itself to see if we can do something about it,” Currie said. “The amount of ethanol the law requires us to be blending into our gasoline stream is absurd. It would increase the amount by about 1.2 billion gallons and would also require about 21 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuels, and we’re not even producing that.”

Refineries have been fined in the past for not refining an amount of cellulosic biofuel that is not scientifically viable, though the courts overturned those fines for 2012 since the biofuel does not exist commercially.

“It’s like mandating to the National Institute of Health, ‘You will cure cancer by 2020,’ ” Currie said. “This is a scientific cellulosic breakthrough that would need to happen before we could produce something economically viable. It may be the fuel of the future, but it may always be the fuel of the future unless they get a scientific breakthrough.”

Sensenbrenner’s office also has introduced a separate bill to limit the EPA’s ability to mandate that refiners blend more cellulosic biofuel than is actually available.

Read more about ethanol and the American Boating Congress, where the industry will be examining ethanol and other topics, in the April issue of Soundings Trade Only.

— Reagan Haynes


4 comments on “House bill would block sales of E15

  1. dfinch

    Notice how we always hear about how much damage ethanol does to vehicles but we never see the evidence, except for that one study done BY THE PETROLEUM INSTITUTE which showed some old clunkers having some trouble with ethanol mixed into ultra-low-octane gasoline. Ask yourself whether you’ve ever had any trouble with the E10 going in your tank, or if you know anyone who has. Is this a major problem for you, or for the 150-year-old oil industry? You can decide that for yourself.

  2. dave

    there are thousands of cases of ethanol destroying fuel tanks, hoses, carbs, injections systems – and that is just with boats. Ask Stihl and some of the similar engine manufacturers about ethanol and their internal combustion engines and systems. Lawn mower engines, compact tractors, motor cycles and almost any 4 cycle powered implement suffers.

    Then there is the whole question of costs of manufacture, ethanol costs more to produce than the energy it returns. Without a factor for damage or repairs after using it.

    One only has to read, or talk to a small engine (boat or other wise) mechanic or auto repair shop to see the problems.

  3. The Original Dave


    As a constituent of the 5thCD, I really want to believe you are looking out for OUR interests when it comes to your gas/oil agenda. None of us want to believe that you are doing this to benefit Big Oil. After all, that would be very very wrong – and you know that.

    So – if you are looking out for us, as you have said in the past, please tell us what your alternative is to E15. We hope that it is not to go back to straight gas. This approach does not move our country forward and is irresponsible as it kicks the gas can down the road to our future generations.

    Being a smart guy you know that fossil fuels cannot, by definition, be our future energy source. Sucking up all of the remaining oil for your use now short changes your grandchildren, Jim. Why do we want to make their lives that much more difficult so your life can be easy and cheap?

    Who are you looking out for with this, and what is your forward thinking alternative to E15?

  4. Capt. Rich

    I’ve lost two weed trimmers and a 175HP Merc outboard to ethanol and the fuel prices at the pump keep going up even though consumption has droped. So, besides driving up the price of food I buy, ethenol has only cost me! There has been zero savings…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments Policy.

Vote Today

What's most important to you when it comes to the federal budget?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Login to Trade Only Today

Lost Password