Massachusetts says residents’ coastal barriers are illegal

Posted on

Residents in one Northeast town pummeled by winter storms and flooding are taking matters into their own hands. The problem — their solution is not only expensive, it’s also illegal.

In the aftermath of a recent series of devastating storms, some property owners on Plum Island in Newbury, Mass., are shelling out tens of thousands of their own dollars to build giant barriers on the beach to protect their homes. State officials say their efforts, though understandable, are illegal, according to WBUR, a Boston public radio station.

Nevertheless, up and down the beach, bulldozers and excavators are digging deep trenches, then filing them with huge rocks or concrete cubes before covering everything over with sand. The process is called beach armoring, and the giant rocks that form an artificial dune are called riprap. Armoring is expensive. In the aftermath of the storm, 10 shoreline Plum Island homeowners agreed to spend $40,000 each to protect their properties.

The state has given property owners until the end of the storm season to take down their barriers; otherwise there will be a showdown over the shoreline fortifications.

Greg Berman, a coastal process scientist with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, told the station that using riprap can make things worse because rocks reflect energy from waves.

“So when it bounces off, it actually expends a lot more energy in a shorter space,” Berman said. “There’s a lot of turbulence in the water, which can excavate out sand in front of that riprap, and then it has the energy to transport it further offshore. So the overall lowering of the beach in front of riprap is, depending on the environment, fairly typical.”

Earlier this week, Ken Kimmell, commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, sent Plum Island property owners a letter acknowledging their difficulties, but warning them that, ultimately, armoring their beachfronts will not prevent flooding during storms or erosion. Kimmell warned Plum Island homeowners that they’ll soon have to pay to remove the dune armor.

But homeowner Teresa Richey isn’t fazed. “I’d like to make a statement and be the first one in line to go to jail,” Richey told the station. “I mean, I don’t think that we’ve done anything to go to jail.”

Click here for the full report.

Welcome to TradeOnlyToday’s premium content! To continue reading, please register now, for access to 10 free stories per month. Or subscribe, for unlimited access to all TradeOnlyToday content!

Click here to Register ... it's free!

Basic subscription: Registered members get free access to 10 premium content stories each month!

Not a member yet? Click here to Register!

Already a member? Click here to Login!

Subscribe ... for unlimited access!

Individual subscription: $29 for unlimited site access for one year.

Small Business subscription: $140 for unlimited site access for up to 10 members of a company for one year.

Corporate subscription: $300 for unlimited site access for all members of a company for one year.

You may close this dialog after seconds.


One comment on “Massachusetts says residents’ coastal barriers are illegal

  1. vissionquest

    No person doing something for their own profit or benefit can see the environmental damage they cause.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments Policy.

Vote Today

What will be the effect of low gas prices on the marine industry?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Search Boats for Sale


Login to Trade Only Today

Lost Password