As the Environmental Protection Agency announced it's extending the comment period on E15, the ethanol industry is scrambling to protect its investment and remain relevant.
Last year, a spike in energy and corn prices caused havoc in the market. With the subsequent collapse of commodity prices, many producers found themselves unable to pay their bills, according to a report on MarketWatch.com.
It is now pushing a rule that, if approved by the EPA, would raise the amount of ethanol that must be blended into gasoline from 10 percent to 15 percent.
The boating industry, among other stakeholders, is against this measure, saying it harms marine engines and that no tests on the impact of E15 have been conducted. So far, more than 25,000 industry stakeholders have sent comments to the EPA against its use, according to the National Marine Manufacturers Association.
The EPA last Friday announced it was extending the comment period to July 20. The agency says it is required to make a decision by Dec. 1.
Click here for an article on the ethanol industry's woes and why it is pushing for the increase to E15.
Click here to submit a comment to the EPA.

Thanks
GEO parts
http://www.iautobodyparts.com/geo/
There have been verified reports of ethanol damaging (disolving)fiberglass fuel tanks on boats in California. This is an INCREDIBLE safety hazard!!! While you have a chance to at least see there is a leak in a car, in a boat the leak is unseen, contained and therefore deadly and insidious. (Bang!)
Our boat is older: a restoration. It is in SE Wisconsin, and spent its early life in Northern waters where there was no ethanol in the gas. Not long after we bought it and moved it south where ethanol was "required," mysterious, frightening things began to happen on board. The boat would suddenly choke, lurch and stop while traveling across the water. (An overboard jolt into Lake Michigan is a bit hazardous too!)
After much investigation, many repeated expensive repairs and finally lab tests and experiments, it was found that the ethanol was causing a breakdown of the shellac that forms in tanks holding gasoline. The byproduct, yukky flaky gas, was clogging and damaging our gasoline hoses and engine parts as well as their function. This happens in older large and small engines as well: older lawnmowers, trimmers, tractors, construction equipment and older cars too. The "dirty gas" causes damage to carburators and engines on top of everything else.
The first mechanics trying to help with our boat asked, "WHERE did you get this GAS???!!" Sorry to say - it was the result of ethanol in our gas manufacturing "junk" in our tanks!
NEW engines and hoses are made to resist ethanol - which just goes to say: the nature of this destructive substance is no secret to the gasoline industry. Long PERSONAL story short - the cost to replace our fuel tanks and repair the attendant damage to the boat was more than $30,000.00. Initial engine repairs, tank draining and investigation charges are not included in that figure!
WE know in OUR home - no question! E15 is not the answer! E-10 should be phased out as well. Aside from and because of damage to tanks, ultimately, lives will be lost due to ethanol in our gas. All it takes in one contained leak from a damaged hose or tank and one explosion on the water. (nevermind the messy, expensive cleanup and resultant damage to the environment!)
Thanks for hearing me out!!
Barbie Rench, Racine, WI
After thousands of dollars in repairs after phase separation in the tank, plus paying $10.00 per gallon for a fuel recovery service, I'm less than enthused with the prospect of going to E15. Boats typically do not have the same fuel turnover a car/truck engine would have; therefore, the longer it sits in the tank the worse the problem becomes. It's not uncommon for fuel to be in the tank for 6 months or more. E15 would increase this likelyhood by 50%. Further degradation of the fuel hoses, filters, and carbuerator problems would occur. Perhaps the ethanol industry could shoulder the responsibility of repair - someone should!!