Brunswick closing Little Falls, Minn., plant

Brunswick Corp. today announced it will consolidate a portion of its aluminum-boat production as part of its ongoing efforts to be more agile and responsive to market demand.

During the next several months, Brunswick will transfer production of its Crestliner and Triton aluminum brands, now built in Little Falls, Minn., to three other manufacturing plants. As a result, the company said, the Little Falls facility will close sometime this fall.

Production of Crestliner and Triton fishing boats and pontoons will be integrated into Brunswick manufacturing plants in New York Mills, Minn., Lebanon, Mo., and Fort Wayne, Ind. Both the Crestliner and Triton brands and their dealer networks will remain intact, and the change is expected to be transparent to the dealers, the company said.

The Little Falls facility will begin to ramp down production in May. As many as 50 percent of Little Falls' current jobs could be transferred to the New York Mills or Lebanon facilities.

Brunswick spokesman Dan Kubera said the move will mean about 90 of the approximately 180 production positions will be terminated in Little Falls, while the rest could be transferred to other plants.

"We do anticipate that many of the people now in Little Falls will be offered roles in those plants, as a reflection of their capability and to provide continuity for the brands which are not affected by this announcement," Kubera said.

"For the past several years, we have worked hard to institute more flexibility into our boat-making capabilities," chairman and CEO Dustan E. McCoy said in a statement. "We have been steadily moving toward 'category' type production that focuses more on models and segments, rather than the traditional approach of having manufacturing facilities dedicated to a particular brand."

"While consistent with our manufacturing strategy, such decisions are always difficult," McCoy added. "This decision does not reflect upon the Little Falls work force or product, but it is the result of our overarching need to develop a more efficient manufacturing footprint that is appropriate to the marine marketplace, which has been under pressure for several years."

Tim Conder, an analyst with Wells Fargo Securities, said this latest move by Brunswick was not surprising and appears to be part of an already communicated restructuring plan.

"We have been anticipating consolidation of the aluminum production for over a year," he said. "We continue to believe [Brunswick] is well-positioned to expand its lead … in the industry as the recovery unfolds in '11."

Last week, Brunswick reported a 22 percent drop in net sales for the fourth quarter of 2009, including a 38 percent decrease in net sales in the boat segment.

Brunswick reported net sales of $657.3 million for the quarter, down from $837.7 million in the year-ago quarter — a net loss of $124 million, or $1.40 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $66.3 million, or 75 cents per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2008.

Today's announcement is the most recent plant closure by Brunswick. In May 2008, the company announced it would close four plants in the coming year, in addition to eight plants it had previously closed. At that time, the company said this would bring the total number of plants to 17 or fewer by 2009 and would reduce the company's fixed-cost structure by $300 million.

— Beth Rosenberg

Comments Comments are closed
19 Thursday, 04 February 2010 23:39
I want to thank Larry Carr for the complements thanks.
18 Thursday, 04 February 2010 23:33

Larry, you sentimental, emotional old dog you.


You're probably one of those guys that thinks they should keep the plant open, Brunswick shouldn't earn a profit, Irwin Jacobs is your hero, and the whole industry should lose money in order to maintain tradition.


Dolinski was right about you!!


Big D

17 Thursday, 04 February 2010 23:16
I'm with Bian Furst when he was in house he allways had his eye on the ball and we were so hot nobody could touch us. We all seen Trouble when he pulled the plug. But its not like he had a choise. When you see Brunswick comeing get out of the way because that ships going to sink they did it before and look at us now its ben a slaughter.
16 Thursday, 04 February 2010 21:40

As a veteran of the Crestliner field sales staff, I'd like to make a few comments. I worked as DSM in Ohio, Indiana and Michigan for Crestliner with Mr. Pogue, Mr. Furst and Mr. Boggs as well as a lot of other great friends at Crestliner in the late '90's.  I will always  look back at those times as a wonderful opportunity to work with a bunch of great people that built the best aluminum boats in the business.  When I left in 2000, the company was rocking.  My departure was not my choice, and one might say I was a victim of a 'prejudice' in certain members of their upper level management.  But I still maintain that the Little Falls plant was one of the best-run aluminum plants in the business and the friends I made then are still good friends to this day no matter how or why I left.  And the welders where the best aluminum welders ANYWERE!


That said, I had spent the previous 12 years with OMC prior to joining Crestliner and watched them go down the tubes from a Fortune 500 company to bankrupt in less than 15 years.  From my 'personal' perspective and it is my 'personal' opinion (I am being politically correct for a change;-), please allow me to point out this oft-quoted old adage:


"If one does not learn from past, one is doomed to repeat it!"  


It sure seem to me that under the present situations with 'certain' aluminum boats companies (you read between the lines here), the past is being repeated in almost a mirror image of the Late and Great OMC.  Combining aluminum lines under one plant as OMC did might be 'good' business, but if not done correctly, and with the input of the primary customer, their marine dealer partners, it does not allow each line to keep its identity.  In my 'opinion', it eventually turns them into generic knock offs of each other to 'save production costs' at the expense of the fundamentally different identities and uses.  The dealers are the ones who suffer the most, since there is really no difference in these lines, followed by the end users.  This is especially true when owned by a company that also owns an outboard power plant line (I refer to Mr. Furst comments on this subject).  I point out the Lowe and Sea Nymph lines in the OMC days as an example of this.  Similar lines, but built at different plants with different identities...until merged together as the OMC Aluminum Boat Group.  A year later, they were turned into generic 'splashes' of each other with different paint jobs.


It is my sincere hope that Brunswick can learn from the past and not repeat the mistakes of their former competitor.  Only time will tell.  In the meantime, R.I.P. to the Crestliner plant in 'Small Falls' and God Bless all those loyal workers who are now going to be 'On the Beach' so to speak.  Hang in there!  There is 'Life' after Crestliner.


I am purposely including my e-mail.  Give me a shout, old friends.  It is time to start a Crestliner Alumni Association and head back to Mille Lacs for a 'Billie Bobber' Reunion!


To Ron 'Boggsie' B., Billy 'Bobber' D., Brian F., Doug 'Elvis' N., Charlie N., Tracy 'Pogie' P, Lori K, Louise and all my friends from the 'Good Old Days' at C-Liner...stay in touch!


Larry Carr Crestliner RSM 1995-2000 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


15 Thursday, 04 February 2010 15:06

We all know how difficult it is to make money in the marine industry, especially during hard times like these.  Why is it then, that people expect a factory that is losing money hand over fist to stay open?  Why do dealers believe that Brunswick/Crestliner/any other brand actually owes them something?  Everybody - manufacturers and dealers - are in this to make a profit.  Why is Brunswick expected not to?


What is most interesting is that Genmar (Irwin, same thing), can abuse the whole system at the expense of dealers and other manufacturers and still be the hero.  In no other industry in the world would such actions be accepted - but not in the good 'ole marine industry, where memories are short and expectations are high regardless of what is happening in the world.


This industry cannot mature as long as people have attitudes like many on this post do.  If you expect the whole industry to lose money at the expense of maintaining tradition, then you are part of the problem.


Good luck to all of those in Little Falls that lost their jobs.  Nobody wants to see this happen.

14 Thursday, 04 February 2010 02:16
Mr. Furst - you hit it right on the head.  Brunswicks promises mean nothing.  By Just1 I also totally agree.  Numbers are very important to Brunswick and that is how I see they treat the employees that have taken great pride in building a high quality boat for many years.  Employees are just numbers - forget about their families and their community is that not what these college boys think. You cannot build a boat on a piece of paper but you would think they would know that - afterall they have the big degree that makes them know everything.
13 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 22:28
Way to go Brunswick you guys know how to run a company into the ground!
12 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 19:42

Mr Investor and risk taker, you "opted out of the sales end of this business".


So those who can't do teach?  I'd imagine you do "know what chapter 11 and 7 area all about".


You've still missed the point that Mr. Furst raised and I tried to point out.

11 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 17:34

One just needs to look across the river to see how running two boat companies out of one building has worked out for Glastron & Larson.  Pretty soon Crestliner & Lund can share vinyl, steering wheels, trailers and hulls and continue to have totally different price points.


I am sure it will all work out well and Crestliner will continue to grow it's market share and we will all live happily ever after.


Oh by the way,  has anyone noticed Larson's market share lately??  They are growing there market share at about the same rate as Maxum.

10 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 16:49
To Tracy, Brian, Mr. Investor and 1941 it is all about Six Sigma developed by Toyota. Go lean and have your quality hit the skids. Thats what it is all about today
9 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 16:04
Sorry Mr. Crestlinerdealer, no one owes you a living, and a plant shouldn't remain open for only for sentimental reasons.  I too am a dealer for over 25 years and have opted out of the sales end of this business.  I know what chapter 11 & 7 area all about.  Quit your whining and get on with adjusting to the fact that changes have to be made.  Obama is not coming to rescue any jobs except to create more government make do schemes.
8 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 14:48

Mr. Furst wrote:


"There is a reason why Alumacraft has been the one to watch in their markethare gains in minnesota. They pay atention to their distribution and manage their business to move their dealers forward!"

It would seem, Mr Investor and risk taker, that the emotion and sentiment you speak of can be useful.  It was employed by Alumacraft to eliminate their excessive production capcacity by capturing Crestliner's market share.


Now go analyze some more numbers.

7 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 13:59

Very sad to see the good folks at Crestliner in Little Falls suffer this dislocation.  I suppose the brand will continue and will change from time to time as it has in the past.  What will never be the same is Little Falls, MN.


Harvey Burgoon

6 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 04:56

I was there for 8 years of the Crestliner ride and a very fun ride it was! Working with a VERY DEDICATED group on the Crestliner side and a similarly dedicated and proactive dealer network. If I remember correctly, it was something like 3500 annual unit sales to start and as Brian says, over 12,000 annual unit sales a decade later (and not just little cartoppers either). Now that's a real boom by anyone's definition.


Sorry to see it played to look like a house of cards by the new guys from Brunswick. It wasn't a house of cards or a numbers game shill. Crestliner was the real deal for that decade and every single line worker, manager, office staff, sales rep, and darn near every dealer understood we were involved in something a heck of a lot bigger than any one of us. It was like being in a whirlwind that just kept going and going.


I still whip out the ol' Billy Bobber Tshirt or the Antolik Open commemorative golf hat (first round I ever shot) from time to time. It's hard to believe it crumbled so fast.


Those fine craftsmen in Little Falls have proven themselves as a solid, hard-working, honest and true crew and I sure hope another great business comes in (or grows nearby) to provide an honest days work for every last person.


Nothing but great memories and great lessons--thanks all!

5 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 02:07

Crestliner yamaha sounds like a smart idea!

4 Wednesday, 03 February 2010 01:50

As a former dealer, now retired, I have watched helplessly as a once proud company and its great employees become victims of bean counters and uncaring larger corporate decisions.


In my opinion, the best Crestliner operation ever was under the ownership of Del Smith and his partners. They truly cared about not just the plant and employees, but the dealer network. We were so proud of the quality, the uniqueness of products (pocket battleships, lovingly), custom ordering, wonderful and informative brochures, top shelf parts/warranty department, efficient loaders in the shipping department, even crusty old Adolph, highly skilled employees in the welding, canvas, upholstery, paint and other departments. And, a friendly and fun office staff. Those were the days! And did we ever have a ball selling the boats. When we heard about the sale to absentee owners, we literally groaned, because the writing was on the wall. Each year, the company would implode a bit farther; too much emphasis on the male buyer and fishing models, less emphasis on family boating, lack of morale within the ranks. It was difficult to watch, but we dealers were paralyzed and had no strength in our meager numbers. A few years ago, when Brunswick decided to eliminate nearly all the individual dealers and assign larger specific territories to Crystal-Pierz Marine, I told my wife that that would be the death knell for Crestliner. Why would you put nearly all your money on one dealer group? It's craziness, that's what.


So what to do? I'd like to see local money, banks, individuals, employees and yes, even the union, to buy back the brand. Go back to what made your boats different and popular. Stay with welded aluminum, build product for the families, set quality standards that cannot be matched, repair your dealer network, build what you can honestly sell and buyers will knock your doors down to buy the boats. I guarantee it.


If you need a manufacturing model, look at Cobalt in Neodosha KS. They "get it" and they sell boats at a premium price.


Now, let me offer one more secret. You have a hidden asset that cannot be purchased or sold. Your former retail customers. Aluminum boats rarely wear out and I personally have seen literally every one of the boats I have sold still being used. Some have had mulitiple owners and repowers, some were passed down in the family. Imagine if those buyers could buy a new boat like the old boat? Somebody with some smarts should be able to find those buyers and contact them. Owner loyalty is fantastic and you could literally go to the bank with that loyalty.


So, what to offer? I'd like to recommend a 15' runabout, rated for 75hp and affordable as an entry model. And don't put every option on it. Just the basics, speedo/tach/horn, decent seating and a choice of 3 colors. Also, a 16' runabout with a 90hp rating, same equipment. Offer canvas, tilt wheel, coolers, storage covers, stereo, etc, but only through the dealership. Prerig is ok, but allow the dealers to offer the motors and trailers and the customer to choose his power. In other words, keep it simple. After you re-establish the brand and ONLY when customers ask for them, then build larger boats, but limit the length to around 21'. That size allows for easy trailering and launching.


That's it. I'd welcome your comments and rebuttals. Best of luck to all of you who really care and thanks for reading.

3 Tuesday, 02 February 2010 23:04

Ditto on Mr. Fursts comments.  A truly sad day in not only Little Falls, but in the marine biz.  When the Big B bought Crestliner, they looked at everyone of us and said..."We are not going to change a thing!".  5 years later, they changed everything.


I truly wish the dealers all over the US and Canada that I had the privelage of working the best of luck.


Tracy Pogue


 

2 Tuesday, 02 February 2010 21:43

"— a net loss of $124 million, or $1.40 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $66.3 million, or 75 cents per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2008."


Mr. Furst, this speaks volumes and you have little to go on except sentiment and emotion.  There is but little choice to eliminate excessive production capacity in an ever decreasing market.

1 Tuesday, 02 February 2010 21:16

It was not that many years ago that Crestliner produced nerly 12,000 units anuually with over 100 million in annual sales!!!! Brunswick clearly did not understand what their decisions have quickly done to a solid dealer network that would have continued to gain sold marketshare. Now this company even before the economy had declined acheived a losss of dealers and lost sales that where off 40% before this econoimc slaughter house executed thier remaining business.


Brunswick clearly never understod Crestliner and its marketing direction but just like the days of AMF at Crestliner the college boys failed to understand what potential they had just inherited and what could be done to take their business to the next level.  Brunswick You may have gained a few Transoms for Mercury but your business plan failed to understand what it was that made Crestliner what it was. Diversification in motor offering allowed dealers to have seperation at the retail level and dealers could maintain indivual selling margins. Again you ignored your dealer base and lost many sucessful accounts that were in fact profitable. Everything that was acomplished in a decade prior to Brunswick begining has been lost. It has been sad to watch!!!


Now the move to New York Mills serves as yet another set back of many that AMF / Brunswick has delivered to Little falls Minnesota.


I wish the Crestliner dealers many who are my personal friends the very best and I pray that your businesses are not ignored when you are put into a facility that does not have your best interests at heart!!


There is a reason why Alumacraft has been the one to watch in their markethare gains in minnesota. They pay atention to their distribution and manage their business to move their dealers forward! The bridges you can burn are limited, and now is the time to recognize this! Little Falls losses a great facility and has employees that cannot be replaced!!    I wish you the very best!