NMMA urges members to oppose lead-tackle ban

The National Marine Manufacturers Association is urging its members to ask the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to reject a request to ban all lead in fishing tackle.

Last month, the Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the EPA to enact a ban under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The ban would include sinkers, jigs, weighted fly line and components that contain lead, such as brass and ballast in a variety of lures, including spinners and stick baits.

"The petition was presented with the aim of reducing bird deaths caused by the ingestion of lead sinkers and jigheads. However, a study conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service found that less than 1 percent of all waterfowl and other birds, such as eagles, are killed by lead sinker ingestion," the NMMA said.

Click here to send in a public comment.

The deadline for comments is Sept. 15.

Comments
11 Monday, 13 September 2010 19:00

It's time that NMMA look forward and encourage manufacturers to evolve & heavily promote those that do.The NMMA is suppose to represent the "leaders" of our industry yet I don't get a sense of inspiration for future generations to follow; the paradigm has shifted & it's time to think differently. Stop whining and start motivating companies to get creative. Finding solutions that will help bottom line but at the same time helping to preserve the environment & having fun is not impossible. We need loans to get companies going, but opposing the lead-tackle ban? Save your breathe and reserve it for another battle.


We need to reward innovation that will get more ppl to come to the shows; The shows have to be relevant to ppl's lives! Right now, ppl feel bad/guilty for depleting our resources & only sailing is eco-sound but having a 'green' product onboard, even if you're a powerboat, is something to brag about. Pls start being in touch w/ younger generations because although many of you protest, a kicking tantrum is not going to get you very far. Encourage innovation, promote & inspire your manufacturers, like other business leaders outside of this industry. Money will come, but you need to be engaged w/ the boaters & potential boaters; stay in touch w/ your audience.

10 Friday, 10 September 2010 12:34
Millions of older homes in the U.S. still have pure lead traps in the drains of their bath tubs and sinks, inthe joints of cast plumbing putting more lead in the water that any sinker or fishing lure. This is just another way to raise the cost of the sport. I am sure mexico and china have removed all the lead from their products. Probably added it to the dog food and toys they sell us now.
9 Thursday, 09 September 2010 22:59

What a bunch of wishy washy namby pambys, just give in to any thing big bama wants and before long there will be no more boating,


FIGHT BACK NOW

8 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 18:35
The ban on lead will happen sooner or later. The short term is to oppose the ban. The correct plan of action is to find a substitute. A substitute that the entire industry can get behind, push, and promote as an industry solution. After all change is going to happen wether we are ready or not. Be proactive!
7 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 17:37
The only reason we need new lead sinkers, is that the old ones are already sitting in the water (or placed in the belly of fish to win tournaments). We are not talking about a few ounces of lead but about thousands of pounds now sitting in our water. When you consider how much lead it takes to destroy the health of a child, I think NNMA has lost its way.
6 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 16:40

Agree with both of these sensible comments. The marine industry should get out ahead on this issue. The future is green.

5 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 16:30

The NMMA has, once again, come down on the wrong side of an issue.


Rather than opposing the ban, NMMA should have been leading the way on finding safe and economical substitutes for lead.


Is it possible that NMMA leadership has consumed too much lead and is now brain-damaged?

4 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 16:19

I consider myself to be green (and I have been in the recreational boating industry for 10 years). But I'm not so swift to condemn the NMMA and agree with the ban on lead in fishing tackle.


The problem is actions like these ultimately do very little to improve water quality or preserve marine and avian life. They are more smoke and mirrors to make us feel good.


No one wants to handle the real problem: non-point source pollution. We all want to put chemicals on our lawns; we all want to live on the waterfront; we are against paying higher taxes for the construction of state-of-the-art water treatment facilities and closing down combined sewerage outfalls; We all want brake pads that work, but contain copper; we all want our chicken, pork and milk to be affordable (farm run off); we all want to dump our cigarette butts on the ground (I quit smoking but this practice is prevalent); and the list goes on.


The problem is us and our avoidance of having the pay for the things that would really do the most ecologically - not lead fishing tackle.


Think about it. When do we start working on the things on shore?

3 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 16:10
We took lead out of paint. We took lead out of gasoline. Why not take the lead out of tackle? We can put a man on the moon but we can't come up with a lead substitute for our tackle? I think not!
2 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 15:35

Why does it seem like the NMMA is always coming out on so many issues that serve only short term benifits, if any?


Lead is a poison. The same arguments were heard years ago about lead shot in shotguns. Yet the sky didn't fall. Hunting wasn't affected. In fact gun dealers sold more ammunition as hunters changed over. Bird mortality dropped and hunting in some areas is better than ever.


Maybe it is time to get the lead out of the water. I am quite sure that birds are not the only one affected as the lead slowly breaks down, poisioning our waters, the fish and other animals, including us. 1% mortality of any species is 1% too much! Does the NMMA actually think a 1% mortality is OK?


Lets look for alternative materials and help clean up the environment. It is about time the NMMA gets their heads out of the sand and realizes green policies are good for the marine industry. They keep all of us boating instead of having large water ways cut off from recreational boating.


In case they are wondering I make my living and have for 35 years in the marine industry. So I'm no outsider here to stir up problems. Once again the NMMA is on the wrong side of the field.

1 Wednesday, 08 September 2010 15:34
It's obvious that opposing this petition is the expected response. Of course. But why not take this as a wake-up call and an opportunity as well? It's clear that lead is poisonous. Why not oppose the immediate ban and take a leadership role in moving the manufacturers away from using toxic substances?

Add your comment

Your name: Required, screen names acceptable
Your email: Required, will not be published

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments Policy.:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: