An appeal of the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to allow E15 into the fuel supply was denied this week in federal court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied a rehearing on the EPA decision that put E15, fuel that is 15 percent ethanol, on the market.
The National Marine Manufacturers Association was among the groups petitioning the court to reconsider a dismissal of the appeal in October.
Dissenting Judge Brett Kavanaugh said the EPA waiver “plainly violates” statutory text, according to court documents filed Tuesday.
“The panel’s decision to throw out the suit on standing grounds is mistaken in multiple independent ways, in my respectful view,” Judge Kavanaugh wrote in his dissent. “And the panel’s standing holding is problematic not only because of the erroneous standing law that it creates, but also because it is outcome-determinative in a case with significant economic ramifications for the American food and petroleum industries, as well as for American consumers who will ultimately bear some of the costs.”
“Today’s result is a win-win for American consumers, providing them with both a choice and savings at the pump, and is a critical step in increasing market access,” Tom Buis, CEO of Growth Energy, said in a statement.
Growth Energy represents ethanol producers.
“Today’s order leaves in place an earlier decision by the court denying challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to allow for E15 to enter the U.S. market,” Buis said. “Furthermore, this is a major victory for the renewable fuels industry and opens the door for further investment in new fueling technology to offer E15 to consumers.”
In August, a three-member panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dismissed a challenge by several industry associations, including the NMMA, to allow E15 into the fuel supply.
The 2-1 decision was disappointing but procedural, Cindy Squires, the NMMA’s chief counsel of public affairs and director of regulatory affairs, told Soundings Trade Only in August.
Two judges said the plaintiffs did not have grounds to bring a case based on court precedents and, therefore, could not consider the merits of the arguments presented. The dissenting judge said the EPA had clearly overstepped its authority.
Opponents to the waiver then requested an en banc review, which means it asked that all of the judges of the D.C. Circuit Court rule on the case, creating a chance to change case law and review the plaintiffs’ arguments on the merits.
However, the court once again refused to grant the review, court documents show.
“The panel’s standing holding is outcome-determinative because EPA will lose if we reach the merits,” Judge Kavanaugh wrote in his dissent. “The E15 waiver plainly violates the statutory text.
“The statute does not allow a waiver for a new fuel if the waiver would cause failure of emissions standards in cars manufactured after 1974,” Kavanaugh continued. “The evidence is undisputed that this E15 waiver would cause failure of emissions standards in cars manufactured through 2000. Yet EPA still granted the waiver. EPA’s action simply cannot be squared with the statutory text.”
In December, the national motor club AAA voiced opposition to E15 in the fuel supply.
“With little consumer knowledge about E15 and less than 5 percent of cars on the road approved by automakers to use that fuel, AAA is urging regulators and the industry to stop the sale of E15 until motorists are better protected,” the group said in a statement.
Click here for the Growth Energy release.
— Reagan Haynes
I solved all my problems with ethanol by not putting it in my boat motors anymore - it's more money, but it solved all problems. So it doesn't bother me anymore on the water, or even in my lawn mower.
Do you vote for people who fight big money in government or who acquiese to big money?
Coal, Oil, gas are bad and passe , we need to embrace at any cost cleaner energy sources.
It's electric for the short term followed by impulse power in the future.
Or maybe we need to get plugged into the virtual matrix???
You are all looking short term the enemy is looking generationally.
WAKE UP!!!
The is nothing more than a scam by the government. They think if they say it loud enough and enough times the boating public will believe their lies. The fact is this. 10% ethanol gas reduces fuel efficiently, causes engine damage, destroys composite fuel tanks and costs more. Not only that they are failing to tell you it takes 2 gallons of diesel fuel in harvesting and refinery equipment to produce one gallon of ethanol. That is basically spending 20% to save 10%. In other words, one step forward and two steps back.
I refuse to use this crap in my boat. I use a fuel delivery service for my boat gas that delivers non ethanol gas.
The ethanol in gas is a failure and they are afraid to admit it and trying to rectify it. Either that or it's all about money, corn farmers lining the pockets of the lobbyists. At our expense!!
Bad for engines plus worse gas mileage. There is a good combination.
Yes, I mind paying higher prices in the grocery so I can put junk in my fuel tank.. But my government knows best.
We appreciate the NMMA and other associations' efforts to fight this uphill battle!