Skip to main content

Be certified or be gone?

  • Author:
  • Updated:
    Original:

It was announced last week that Sailfish Boats and Tracker Marine Group are the latest to join 23 other brands in providing financial assistance to their dealers completing the industry’s dealer certification program. (Go to www.dealercertification.org) for complete list of 25 brands.)

Those of you who regularly read this Blog know I am a strong supporter of the dealer certification Program. I believe it has value for every dealership that successfully completes it. But today I have some mixed feelings brought on by the announcement by Sailfish Boats.

Specifically, Sailfish dealerships may co-op up to 50 percent of certification expenses. That’s good. Tracker dealers will receive a special allowance of $500 each model year to offset certification program fees. That’s also good. But here’s where I start to get uneasy. Additionally, the announcement said Sailfish Boats has set a goal for 100 percent of its dealerships to enroll in the dealership certification program in this model year, with 75 percent completing the certification process before the close of the model year. Moreover, all Sailfish dealerships are required to become certified by the change of model year 2009. Now, there are those feelings!

On one hand, wanting to see all Sailfish dealers achieve certified status is an exciting goal. It will likely strengthen all Sailfish dealerships and even Sailfish’s position in the marketplace.

On the other hand, Sailfish’s decision to require all its dealers to become certified raises some interesting questions. For example, should we now expect other boatbuilders to follow this precedent? Should it even be a requirement, presumably included in the Dealer Agreement, in the first place? What will happen to a dealer who is unable to meet the deadline - cancelled? If the manufacturer requires it, should that builder pay all the costs of dealer certification?

How about re-certification? What happens if a dealer becomes de-certified in the future? Is mandatory certification by a deadline more preferable in the long run than voluntary participation with financial supports and incentives for those that enroll?

I’m guessing many of you have already thought of other questions and/or have some clear opinions swirling around in your mind on this surprise move by Sailfish. Are we looking at one-upmanship here or the start of a trend?

Related

1_TRAVELIFT.COOP

Marine Travelift Launches Co-op Program

The company received its first student, a University of Wisconsin engineering major, in the seven-month paid co-op.

1_JULY4

Trade Only Today Returns Tuesday

The e-newsletter will not publish July 4 in observance of Independence Day. We wish everyone a safe holiday weekend.

1_ORR.FUNDS

ORR Announces Federally Funded Projects

The U.S. Economic Development Administration prioritized outdoor recreation for the first time

Norm#4

Ten Ways To Sell in a Tough Economy

These keys to successful selling can help you create customers who keep coming back, even when sales dip

1_ASA.BOARD

ASA Names New Board Members

The American Sportfishing Association filled two at-large seats and two regional seats on its board of directors.

1_EXEC.SEARCH

Dammrich, Hopkinson Partner With Marine Resources Recruitment

The industry veterans will help clients fill executive-suite, marine industry job openings around the world.

1_PULSE.PING.0630

DEALERS: How Was Business in the First Half of 2022?

With the second quarter coming to a close, was there parity between the budget and financial performance in the first six months? Take the Pulse Report survey here.

1_PMMPODCAST

Passagemaker Relaunches Podcast

Trawler Talk aims to connect with those who are interested in the cruising lifestyle, with episodes dropping every other week