Brokerage found liable for misrepresentation

Author:
Updated:
Original:

A Fort Lauderdale, Fla., brokerage was found liable for $1.7 million in damages after a Rhode Island man filed suit claiming the 66-foot yacht he bought in 2007 was "not seaworthy."

HMY Yacht Sales was found liable for negligent misrepresentation by a federal jury April 28 in Fort Lauderdale, according to court documents. Jim Barboni, the HMY broker who led the deal, also was found liable of negligent misrepresentation and was ordered to pay $100,000, court documents show.

HMY Yacht Sales was found liable for 85 percent of the damages, Barboni for 5 percent, according to court documents. Additional defendants, not listed in the final judgment, were also found guilty of negligence.

Brian O'Neill traveled to South Florida to purchase the sportfishing boat in March 2007 after seeing an HMY ad online listing it for $2.6 million, according to court documents. The boat is referred to as a "2005 Twin Screw 66-1/2 foot fiberglass motor yacht 'Bryemere' f/k/a 'M/V Double Billed.' " It was described as such: "This awesome like 'NEW' ... solid fiberglass Custom Carolina Sport Fish has all the attributes you would expect out of a high performance custom yacht. The speed, sea handling and those looks, with the sleek profile and Carolina flare."

O'Neill met with HMY's Barboni and the yacht's previous owner, Richard Talbert, March 18, 2007, in North Palm Beach and viewed the boat. Later that month, Talbert, Barboni and O'Neill took the vessel out on Lake Worth - not the Atlantic - while a surveyor conducted a sea trial, court documents show.

O'Neill purchased the boat for $2.3 million in April 2007 and began to notice problems during a trip from South Florida to New England, according to the suit. A transducer began leaking, sludge poured from the fuel tanks, and the hull was "flexing." He said he had the boat surveyed again in Rhode Island, and a naval architect deemed the boat "not structurally sound" and "unsafe to operate."

After an unsuccessful attempt to nullify the sale, O'Neill sued HMY in 2007, claiming the brokerage misrepresented the yacht's condition.

Court documents show that HMY attorneys based much of their defense on the "as is" clause in the sale contract, describing the situation as a case of buyer's remorse.

O'Neill's attorneys countered that the "as is" clause was not valid because of several misrepresentations about the boat by HMY, as well as vague language in the contract.

This article originally appeared in the June 2010 issue.

Related

Polaris Names CEO and CFO

Previously interim executives, Michael Speetzen was named the CEO and Bob Mack the CFO of the Minnesota-based powersports company.

Sanlorenzo Reports Q1 Financials

The Italian builder continues to gain market share and expects to debut five models at Cannes in September and launch three new lines in 2022.

New Hope for Killing Algae Blooms

Researchers are experimenting with injecting ozone nanobubbles into waterways that burst and cut off the algae’s food supply.

Mercury’s Impact on the Local Economy

A new study shows that the manufacturer has a more than $5 billion annual impact on the Fond du Lac, Wis., community.

Lippert Posts Record Q1

The quarter marked a “watershed moment” for the component supplier, as net sales hit $1 billion.

Rollick Reaches 100th OEM Customer Mark

Customers that use its Aimbase marketing technology represent 65 percent of U.S. marine unit sales.

Safe Harbor Adds Lauderdale Marine Center

The Florida superyacht facility was acquired in a deal worth $340 million.